[…] which recovery housing operators recruit ed individuals with SUD to specific recovery homes and treatment providers , who then billed patientsтАЩ insurance for extensive and unnecessary drug testing for the pur poses of profit. For example, officials from the Florida state attorneyтАЩs office told GAO that SUD treatment providers were paying $300 to $500 […]

[…] to participate as nonrandomized participants. Both randomized and nonrandomized clients attended the same day hospital and com– munity residential programs.The first aim of this article was to test the relative effectiveness of day hospital versus community residential programs (chosen for their social model orientation) on abstinence at 6 and 12 months. We hypothesized that […]

[…] social problems of clients (e.g., problems in– volving family/friends, legal issues or employment issues) without providing medical care (Institute of Medicine, 1990). Four sets of hypotheses were tested in relation to 6– and 12–month outcomes and associated treatment costs. First, taking into consideration the presence of medical and psy– chiatric staff at the DH […]

[…] & Hughes, 1993). In the city of Los Angeles, recovering AA members opened “twelfth step” houses to address the increased need for alcohol– and drug-free living environments. Managers of these houses either mandated or strongly encouraged attendance at AA meetings. By the 1960s, Los Angeles supported several dozen such houses (Wittman, Biderman, & Hughes, […]

[…] (regardless of type) or from another subject residence. u Operating standards set in the ordinance, and require operators to implement rules in areas including relapse policy, drug testing policy, good neighbor, notification of neighbors. u Discharged residents to be returned to place of origin at operatorтАЩs expense. u Addresses of permitted residences are public […]

[…] (regardless of type) or from another subject residence. u Operating standards set in the ordinance, and require operators to implement rules in areas including relapse policy, drug testing policy, good neighbor, notification of neighbors. u Discharged residents to be returned to place of origin at operatorтАЩs expense. u Addresses of permitted residences are public […]

[…] https:// soberlivingapp. com/sober–living–app–blog/2021/8/3/understanding–national–regulations–on–sober–living–homes–in–the–united–states–part–1 35 Substance Use Disor der: Prevalence of Recovery Homes, and Selected States’ Investigations and Oversight, U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, 116th Cong. (2019) ( testimony of Mary Denigan–Macauley). https://legislativeanalysis.org/wp–content/uploads/2019/11/Recovery­ Homes.pdf DECEMBER 2023 Prepared by Regina LaBelle, Shelly Weizman, David Sinkman, and Madison Fields. This brief is a product of the Addiction […]

[…] line with these values, rather than to save money. For example, a residence that is struggling to make payments may decide to cut sta� or reduce drug testing, thereby putting their mission and values at risk . Standard 3: Be �nancially honest and forthright �is standard outlines an expectation of full disclosure and documentation […]

[…] For more information on reas onable accommodations, read Are You in Recovery from Alcohol or Drug Problems? Know Your Rights . Medical Inquiries and Examinations and Drug Tests. The ADA and Rehabilitation Act strictly limit what em ployers may ask about an applicant’s or employee’s medical conditions and histor y. These rules are described […]

[…] the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status (children under 18 living with a parent or guardian), or national origin. 2 The Act prohibits housing -related policies and pract ices that exclude or otherwise discriminate against individuals because of protected characteristics. The regulation of land use and zoning is tr aditionally reserved […]